Thursday, February 23, 2012

Mixed First Impressions


                Annie on My Mind is very different from the other books we have read. In the past books, there have been many different characters to identify; however, in this book, there are only two characters to connect to. I like the fact it is based on two characters because for young adults it is easy to comprehend and stay focus on those two characters. For only downfall is for older readers reading this it is hard to get into the book because there is little interaction between characters and hard to get into the book. Yes, it is an easy read but difficult to get excited to keep reading. The book isn’t a bad book but right now it isn’t a book that keeps me reading. Annie on My Mind has not drawn me in meaning the plot, characters, or the style is bland. I feel as if something is missing to draw me in to keep the book in my hand.
                The controversy part of the book doesn’t bother me because it is more accepted and talked about in our generation. I like how it was not very graphic when it talks about new exploring new feelings and relationships. It was hard to comprehend that the girls were seniors in high school because of their imagination. While they are in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the girls were playing knights and pretending to ride horses which throw me off thinking about their age. I know it’s okay to have an imagination but this pretend play is what third graders play not seniors in high school. It is also hard to picture the girls because the author does not give any physical features except for some detail about Annie’s eyes.
                Overall, the book is good and has a developing relationship between the girls. I also like how it is a love story about two completely different teenagers. Liza and Annie are both very different people, from Annie’s love of plants and music to Liza’s passion for architecture. As young adults, it can help gain perspective in finding yourself. The final thing I enjoy in the book is the letter format throughout the book. Those letters give hints or reasons to keep reading to finally find out why they do not talk anymore.

3 comments:

  1. I like how you mentioned the controversy part should be behinde this book but that it doesn't bother you. I think to myself that some of the books that we have read there is a little controversy with each one and I know I am taking this class to be a teacher one day and I can't help but think to myself, how can I apply these books to my classroom without setting off a red flag to students and parents? Sorry your comment lead me to a different frame of mind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To continue the direction Alisha headed, it may be that times have changed since 1982, but is everyone comfortable with same-sex relationships? How do you--or do you--think this book would fit in a school or classroom library?

    I like what you say about the letters--you're anticipating post question #3 for the book, which is great.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My sister works for a judge at the court house. She told me today they married at least a dozen lesbian couples. She said it was fun and very festive, she threw rose petals and took pictures. I wonder if she would have had the same reaction in 1982?

    ReplyDelete