The
epistolary writing style means that the story is written in letters. The actual
plot of the book is written in flashbacks as Liza reflects on her relationship
with Annie. This style of writing is not my ideal reading choice, but I do see
its usefulness in creating characterization. While reading, this style can be
both infuriating and reassuring.
The book
starts with words that Liza wishes she could speak to Annie (3). This draws the
reader away from setting. The author could have said, “Liza looked out the
window and the Statue of Liberty and in the distance, the Gateway Arch,” and
few of the readers would have noticed, or cared about, this impossibility
because we want to know why Liza wrote this instead of her homework and what it
means. The writing style allows the author to focus on the characters, more specifically
Annie, because from the first words, that is where our attention is drawn.
To me, it
is annoying to read a book that focuses so little on the present tense. It
feels like I know the very ending of the story, but not the middle: not the how
or the why. This is why it is reassuring as well. I know that nothing I am reading
about in the past is going to mess up Liza’s goal of getting into MIT (4). What
is even more irritating than the left out chunks of time is the way in which
Liza reflects. I am forced to wonder whether or not her memory is faulty, glossing
over the fights she and Annie have and remembering the good times more
distinctly, as many of us do. The way that most reflect on a situation is different
from the actual occurrence, especially when dealing with “love.”
The
characters, as I have said, are the most developed part of this story. However,
this really applies to Annie the best, which does make sense. This is written
by a college freshman reflecting on her first “love.” It seems like it is
written by a 13-year-old. I work with middle schoolers and have seen them
behave the way the Liza does: falling fast and hard, having only that person on
their minds, seemingly floating through the rest of life (97), and believing
that nothing bad will happen as long as they are together. By the freshman year
of college, most of us know a little better than to believe any of these. The
story being written in this style makes the characters more annoying to me than
a story written in first-person, presents tense because, generally, in those
stories, the main character will allude to obsessing over the one person, but
we will be spared the details.
I think
that this story could have been more effective if it had been written in the
present tense and ended with a time-skip to the middle of the freshman year of
college. I think we would have seen a more believable relationship develop and
we would have been told more negative emotions from Liza, rather than only the mostly
positive ones and the few negative ones she chooses to remember. We also would
not know if the two were still on speaking terms throughout the whole book. The
fact that Annie still writes to Liza (4) tells us that their relationship was
not ended by the problems we are seeing in the flashbacks and that ruins the
suspense.
I like knowing the end of a book, so your comment that the reader needn't worry makes me chuckle and think of my own reading style. But is there some suspense? Earlier in your post, it seems like you think there may be, but at the end, you say there's not. But we know all the way through the book that Liza's not sending the letters--does that create some kind of suspense?
ReplyDelete